 |
Treasury of Sermons -
Salvation
What About People Who Have Never Heard of the Gospel?
By Rev Charles Seet
(Preached at Life BP Church 8 am service, 8 Dec 2002)
Text:
Romans 1:21-24; 2:14-16
I. The Universal Scope of the Gospel
In order for us to fully appreciate the difficulty of answering
this question please allow me first to give you some background
behind it. When the Lord Jesus gave the Great Commission to His
disciples, He told them“Go ye therefore and teach all nations”
(Matthew 28:19) The word for ‘nations’ here is ethnos, and that
would include every tribe, language, and ethnic group, regardless
of whatever philosophy of life or religion they already have. In fact
when in the Great Comission that is found in Mark 16:15 which Jesus gave
His disciples on a different occasion, He said, “Go ye into all the
world, and preach the gospel to every creature.” The gospel
is to meant be heard by every creature (referring to man, of course).
There is therefore no doubt that the Gospel has a universal scope
of application. All men are lost; all men need to be saved;
therefore all men must hear the Gospel, or else they will not be
saved.
However, from the time that Christ gave this commission to His disciples
onward, not all men have heard the Gospel. According to the history of
missions, the Gospel went forth from Jerusalem, to Samaria, and through
Paul’s missionary journeys, it went into Asia Minor, Greece and Rome.
From Rome it went to the rest of Europe, and from there it proceeded
unto the uttermost parts of the earth. All this has taken hundreds of
years to accomplish, and the work is still going on today. In fact the
task of missions is still considered an unfinished task. The
world today has about 6.2 billion people and it is
estimated that about one fifth of that is still beyond reach of
the present proclamation of the gospel. This means that about 1.2
billion people in the world today have never heard the gospel even once!
Unless missionaries are sent to bring the Gospel to them now, these 1.2
billion people may die without hearing the Gospel at all.
Besides that, in all the time that it has taken the
Gospel to reach the rest of the world, many people have already died
before the Gospel ever reached their part of the world. That includes
our forefathers who worshipped idols in their homelands in India, China
and other parts of Asia. They all died in their sin and heathen
darkness, without ever knowing the only way of salvation in Jesus
Christ. They are not like us here who have been so wonderfully blest to
have had the Gospel brought to us, and some of us before we were saved
have even heard the Gospel message not just once but many times, and
there was ample opportunity for us to turn to Christ and be saved.
Now, these people who are entirely out of reach
of the Gospel are different from unbelievers who live within reach
of the Gospel. The ones who live within reach of the Gospel have
probably heard the Gospel in some form or other – through a
Christian friend or relative, or a gospel tract, or a Gospel rally they
were invited to attend. But when they heard the message of salvation,
the message did not take root in their heart and bear any fruit of
salvation in their lives. And so they reject Christ and die
without salvation from their sins. It is not difficult for anyone
to see that their condemnation from God is just and righteous, since
they had all turned away from the salvation that had been freely
offered to them.
II. The Ones Who Never Hear The Gospel
But our topic this morning concerns a different group
of people, namely those who never had salvation in Christ offered to
them because the Gospel message never reached them, and because of this
they die without Christ. What will become of them? Would it be just for
God to give them the same condemnation that was given to those
who heard but rejected the Gospel message? Can they plead ignorance
in order to escape God’s condemnation? The answer from the Scriptures is
‘No they cannot.’ Their end will be just the same as those who have
rejected the Gospel. Since their names are not written in the Book of
Life they will not have eternal life, but rather eternal death.
In the message that we had here some weeks ago we saw what that means –
it means spending unending time in painful torments in the awful
fires of Hell!
Now here is the point of difficulty in answering the question: “What
about those people who have never heard the Gospel?” Is it fair for
these souls to share the same fate as those who heard the Gospel and
rejected it? Now, because of the difficulty that this question presents,
there are some who try to use their own human wisdom to provide
an answer.
They teach that if God is just and fair, the heathen who die without
ever hearing the gospel can still be saved on the basis of how
they respond to whatever they know of God from nature. This was the kind
of thinking that became popular in the early decades of the 20th
century – the thinking that there was something good in every
human religion that Christians should learn from and accept. And this
eventually led to the Ecumenical movement, which openly states that
adherents of pagan religions may be saved without ever hearing the
Gospel of Christ. They have even attempted to use the Word of God to
justify this teaching.
One passage of Scripture that has been used is Acts 10:34-35 – “Then
Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is
no respecter of persons: But in every nation he that feareth
him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with him.” And so
they say that according to this verse, as long as a person has some
basic concept of God, and tries to do good works to please God, God will
accept him. He may be a Buddhist, Hindu, Muslim or Animist – so long as
he is trying his level best to live up to his own religion, he will be
saved. But this interpretation takes the passage out of context, because
the words were actually spoken by the Apostle Peter in the house of
Cornelius, a Roman Centurion. Cornelius was a God-fearing Gentile, but
he still needed to hear the Gospel through Peter in order to be saved.
What Peter meant in vv,34,35 is that God has chosen those who are His
people, not from one nation alone – which is Israel – but that He has
also chosen to save people from every Gentile nation. Now if
Peter meant to say that God accepts these people even without
their knowing Jesus Christ, what do you think he would have done? I
believe he would have just congratulated Cornelius for having earned
God’s favour by being such a god-fearing Gentile, and then left the
house in peace. But what he did after this shows that god-fearing
Gentiles like Cornelius still need to be saved from their sins by
trusting in Christ alone. He preached Christ to Cornelius and his
household. In. v.36 he said “The word which God sent unto the
children of Israel, preaching peace by Jesus Christ: (he is Lord
of all)” This is a direct reference to the Gospel of Christ that
alone can bring sinners into peace with God. What do you think would
have happened if after hearing this Gospel message from Peter, Cornelius
rejected Christ? He would not be saved, even though he had
feared God.
The important point is: There is absolutely no salvation for even the
most pious and religious person in the world so long as he does not have
Christ. There is absolutely no alternative way of salvation. Jesus
Himself said this categorically in John 14:6 – “…I am the way, the
truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by Me.” The
same truth is given in Acts 4:12 – “Neither is there salvation in any
other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men,
whereby we must be saved.” That name is the name above all names –
the name of Jesus Christ. And since there is no other name that can
bring salvation but His name, we must then declare His name and His
salvation to every nation, with a sense of utmost urgency, since
millions of souls are perishing without Him. Outside Christ, there is
not even the slightest possibility of salvation!
And if there is even the least possibility of salvation without
Christ, then missions will no longer be such an urgent matter for
us any more. Why take all the trouble and expense to send missionaries
to the far-flung mission fields of the world to reach the heathen, if
they can be saved without Christ? Some may even suggest that the heathen
would be much better off not hearing the gospel at all, and just
left to continue to be happily ignorant of Christ, for then there would
be no possibility of them rejecting Christ at all, and of
ever being condemned for rejecting Him.
Dearly beloved, this kind of thinking is utterly mistaken for one
important reason: Whatever knowledge of God that the heathen have is
insufficient to save them. It is only sufficient to judge them.
God’s Word in Romans 1:20 tells us plainly – “For the invisible
things of Him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being
understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and
Godhead; so that they are without excuse:” But instead of leading
men to fear God and worship Him, this inadequate knowledge of God
has only leads them deeper and deeper into sin and false worship, as
stated in the next three verses – “Because that, when they knew God,
they glorified Him not as God, neither were thankful; but became
vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was
darkened. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made
like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and
creeping things.”
Now, besides the knowledge of God in nature, God has also given all men
a conscience that enables them to know the difference between
right and wrong. Romans 2:14-15 refers to this God-given conscience by
saying, “For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature
the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law
unto themselves: Which shew the work of the law written in their
hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts
the mean while accusing or else excusing one another;)”
The end result of being directed by one’s conscience alone is still
condemnation. This is because the sinful nature which every man
inherits from Adam causes them to go against their own conscience. And
at the Day of Judgment, the unsaved will be judged by the Great Judge of
the Earth according to their works. And under His divine examination
which looks not only at the outward act, but penetrates deep into
the inward hidden motives and selfish thoughts, all the
righteous deeds of the very best men on earth will be shown up to be
nothing but filthy rags.
And this is one thing we can be sure of: That the condemnation of those
who have never heard the Gospel will be completely fair and just,
because God is righteous in all His judgements (Dan 9:14; Deut
32:4; Gen 18:25). And so, when the unevangelised heathen are condemned
to eternal death, they cannot say that they are being condemned just
because God did not send them the Gospel. They are condemned for
no other reason than their own sinfulness before a Holy God.
III. The Sovereignty of God Determines Who Are The Ones Who Hear and
Believe the Gospel
But someone may then say, “Isn’t God in some sense responsible for
their condemnation? If He had only elected them to be saved,
surely their sins would have been washed away by Christ, and they would
not be condemned at all.” Can an unsaved person stand before God’s
Judgment seat one day and say to Him, “God, You really have no right
to send me to hell, because what I am now is entirely the result of
your sovereign will, and you had not chosen me before the foundation
of the world. It is therefore not my fault that I am not saved. So You
have no right to make me suffer for it.” The answer to this
perplexing question is a definite NO, no unsaved person can ever make
put the blame for his unsaved condition on God. Why? Because it is
their own sins that bring them into judgment. God merely permits
them to receive the just judgment that is due to them for their sins.
Hence on the day of judgement, the unsaved who never heard the Gospel
will righteously be condemned to eternal death in hell, because they
are responsible for their own sins. The Bible is clear that every man
will be held responsible for his own faults and sins.
Now, many people are bothered by another question – If God’s election or
choice at the beginning of time was the thing which decided who
should hear the Gospel and be saved, then why did He not
choose more to be saved? Why did He choose only the elect to hear the
Gospel and be saved? This question, if not properly handled can lead to
doubting God’s goodness. The reasoning given is that if God is
good, surely He would not bear to see any sinner missing out on
salvation, dying in sin and suffering in hell. Surely He should have
elected all and made sure that every single person who lives on
earth has the opportunity to hear the Gospel and be saved. Since He did
not elect all, but only some, that shows that His goodness is not
infinite but limited.
But let us remember that God is also a holy God. According to His
holiness, “the soul that sinneth, it shall die” (Ezekiel
18:4,20). Hence by right, absolutely no sinner should be saved at all.
Now if God should have chosen to save just one sinner alone –
that would already have been most marvelous mercy. It is utterly
undeserving. But lo and behold, He has chosen to save not just one, but
a whole multitude of sinners. That multiplies His glorious grace
many times more.
Let us just imagine that in a certain country there are 50 men who have
been justly given the death sentence for heinous crimes they committed,
and they are all waiting for the time of their execution on death row in
prison. Now, it happens to be the king’s birthday, and the king decides
to show his goodness by granting amnesty and freedom to a few of these
men. So he goes down to visit the death row. He looks at all fifty of
them, and all of them are equally deserving of death. Then he selects 3
of them, to whom he says. “Out of the goodness of my heart, I am
removing the death sentence from you. You can walk out of this prison
now, as free men.” The 3 men are understandably elated and they
prostrate themselves before the king, thanking him profusely for sparing
their lives.
But the rest of the prisoners become disappointed and angry at the king
for not choosing them. They say to him, “You cannot do that to us.
You are not being fair to us!” And the king only says to
them, “If it is fairness that you want, then not even a single one of
you would be released. What I have given to the three men I chose is not
what they deserve, but what they do not deserve.” Dear friends, the
same thing applies to our salvation. The fact that God chose to save
only some does not mean that He is unfair to the rest. Elect or not
elect, all men were sentenced to eternal death because of their sins.
But God’s goodness is magnified in the fact that even before the
foundation of the world, God had already chosen us to be in Christ. And
this led to the outworking of His providence to bring us the gospel,
and the inworking of His Holy Spirit in our hearts, to bring us into
the saved status that we enjoy today. And we should now be most
grateful to God for all this. And this should also make us
humble. We have no one but God to thank, for our salvation.
We cannot claim any credit for ourselves.
As for those who have never heard the Gospel and are condemned as a
result of that – they have no one but themselves to blame for
their unsaved condition, and so they have to bear full responsibility
for themselves. I hope that this enables us to answer the question “What
About People Who Have Never Heard of the Gospel?” There is one other
question that is sometimes asked as well, related to this one:
IV. What About Those Who Are Incapable of Hearing the Gospel?
We are not talking anymore about those who are outside the reach
of the Gospel, but of those who may be within reach of some kind of
Gospel witness, but who are just unable to understand it. E.g.
those who die in infancy or who are mentally deficient. How can infants
dying in infancy believe in Christ? And how can those who are
mentally deficient believe in the Gospel message when they cannot
even understand simple words? Are they totally denied salvation
merely because they lack the capacity to understand the Gospel?
It must be admitted that God’s Word does not speak very much on this
matter. But Jesus did say in Luke 18: 16 – “Suffer little children
to come unto Me, and forbid them not: for of such is the kingdom of
God.” And King David expressed confidence that he will see his
deceased infant son in heaven one day, 2 Samuel 12:23 – “I shall go
to him, but he shall not return to me.”
But beyond these few statements and some good and necessary inferences
that we can make from Scripture, there is a definite limit upon
what we may legitimately say on this matter. To say more than this is to
venture into the unknown. There are some who speculate that all infants
who die in infancy are automatically saved because it is claimed
that they are all innocent and have no sin. But the Scriptures
teach the sober truth that we are are already sinners not only from
birth, but even from the moment of conception, even though no actual
sins have been committed yet. David testified in Psalm 51:5 –
“Behold, I was shapen in iniquity; and in sin did my mother conceive
me.”
This sinful nature can be seen even in the behaviour of newborn babies –
you can see how quickly they learn how to get their mummies and daddies
to respond to their griping and crying. And so even one who is still in
a state of infancy is a sinner in need of salvation, and if he
dies, there is no automatic salvation for him. And so we must be careful
not to speculate on this matter or else we may end up believing things
that are not scriptural at all. We may even end up teaching a new method
of salvation – by dying in infancy! This is why the only thing that the
Westminster Confession ventures to say about this matter is that
“Elect infants, dying in infancy, are regenerated and saved by Christ
through the Spirit, who worketh when, and where, and how he pleaseth. So
also are all other elect persons, who are incapable of being outwardly
called by the ministry of the word.” (WCOF Chapter X, para 3)
All that is stated here is that by the same divine election
that we have been saved, those who are incapable of hearing
the Gospel can also be saved. It does not go on to speculate how
this happens, or how many of such persons are elected to
salvation, whether they include only the infants of Christian parents or
also those of non-Christian parents. All those whom God elects
are ultimately saved, and their salvation is wrought by God only through
Jesus Christ alone.
But what is good for us to know out of all this, is that because
according to the Scriptures, salvation is completely wrought by
the sovereign work of God, God is still able save those who die
in infancy and those who are mentally deficient. Their incapacity poses
no barrier to God’s work of salvation. That puts them on the same
level as eveyrone else. And this gives us hope to comfort others
and also ourselves if have loved ones in such a state – a child who dies
in infancy or is born with some abnormality which makes him mentally
handicapped. Let us do our best for them knowing that God can save them.
Pray for them, communicate Christ to them as simply as we can, and leave
the rest up to God.
And actually, we too before we were saved, were just like them and not
very different from them. We too were incapable of responding to
the Gospel of Christ. Jesus said, “No man can come to Me, except the
Father which hath sent Me draw him” If God had not worked in your
heart, and drawn you to Christ, you would not be saved today! |